Search blog.co.uk

Saint Emilion in chaos

by janeanson @ 2008-07-04 - 12:04:56

The fallout from the annulment of the Saint Emilion classification is going to be pretty severe. At the moment, the chateaux are having to change the labels on all of their 2006 wines, to take off cru classe mentions. A few are saying that are keeping it on and will face the fines.

Bordeaux negociants are already reporting dismay from English wine merchants, and added to the 2007 prices, it is doing more to put people off buying Bordeaux. But there is a bright side - the 2006 are going to become very attractive if they are the last cru classe labels for the forseeable future.

Here is a roundup of various news sources talking about what has happened:

from Wine Spectator: http://www.winespectator.com/Wine/Features/0,1197,4473,00.html

Château owners in St.-Emilion need to order new wine labels, just as they are preparing to bottle their 2006 wines. The administrative court of Bordeaux struck down the Right Bank appellation's classification system on July 1, which means any wines from 2006 or later cannot be labelled as Grand Cru Classé or Premier Grand Cru Classé. Château Ausone's ranking is no different from any other estate

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/2236807/Bordeaux-wines-'demoted'-by-French-court.html"

And a few choice reactions, reported in the Telegraph: It's an aberration to condemn the classification over so little," said Nicolas Thienpont, owner of Chateau Pavie-Macquin, recently awarded the second highest rank of St Emilion premier grand cru classé.

"All those who have worked so hard to move up the rankings are being told today: 'sorry, because of four imbeciles who don't agree with it, we will cancel everything'," he said.

Trackback address for this post:

authimage

Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments

technomisttechnomist [Member]
04/07/08 @ 13:27

I am afraid I can't fully understand your article, as it assumes a great deal of knowledge of the background and context which I do not have. The wine spectator link was not very helpful, as they require subscribers.

The Telegraph article does not explain what is meant by the system being 'partial'. Do they mean biased and/or unfair, or incomplete? What is the system? Why did the court not uphold it?

Per [Visitor]

04/07/08 @ 14:20

I am a bit puzzled by this.

Yes, the classification was annulled by a court in the first instance.

But wasn't it then so that a higher court ruled that the annulment should be annulled, so to speak, because the StE classification was of national interest (or something of the sort) so that it should after all be valid?

Leave a comment :

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <!, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, img>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)
Validation code:
Please enter the above code here:
For protection from spambots (case-sensitive).

Footer

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.